AIG Names Inside Hire to Head Mortgage Insurance Unit
at Tuesday, June 02, 2009 9 comments
Labels: AIG, AIG Insurance, Insurance
AIG Replaces Nutt as Chief of Mortgage Insurance Unit
at Monday, June 01, 2009 1 comments
Labels: AIG Insurance, Insurance
AIG, Uncle Sam and Sharia
A federal judge in Michigan has declined to dismiss an ex-Marine's lawsuit that insurance giant AIG is using tax dollars to promote Islamic Sharia law and charities that may be funneling money to terrorist organizations.
Just when you thought the government's massive bailout of AIG couldn't get more complicated or controversial.
The facts of the case "raise a question of whether the government's involvement with AIG has created the effect of promoting religion and sufficiently raise Plaintiff's claim beyond the speculative level," U.S. Dist. Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff ruled.
The judge's ruling, a surprise to many legal scholars who think the suit will never go to trial, adds a troubling religious dimension to an already troubling economic crisis. It also shines a spotlight on Sharia-compliant financing, a growing part of the $1 trillion Islamic banking industry.
Sharia, or Islamic law, encourages trade and investment, but bans interest and prohibits investments in certain areas such as gambling, alcohol, pornography, abortion, human cloning, conventional banks or insurers, and most forms of entertainment. Under Sharia, making money from money, such as charging interest, is usury and therefore not permitted. Western banks and investment companies have established Sharia-compliant accounts overseen by imams and Islamic scholars.
According to the lawsuit, filed by the conservative Christian Thomas More Law Center, at least a portion of AIG's $40 billion federal bailout has been used to support Sharia-compliant financial products. The suit claims that violates the First Amendment's establishment clause. "It is outrageous that AIG has been using taxpayer money to promote Islam and Shariah law, which potentially provides support for terrorist activities aimed at killing Americans," Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center, said in a statement.
The federal judge hasn't ruled on the merits of the case, but he did acknowledge that "at least two of AIG's subsidiary companies practice Sharia-compliant financing, one of which was unveiled after the influx of government cash." He also noted "That after the government acquired a majority interest in AIG and contributed substantial funds to AIG for operational purposes, the government co-sponsored a forum entitled "Islamic Finance 101."
Many legal experts doubt that such actions constitute a violation of church (or mosque) and state.
"The government no more cares about advancing Sharia through the AIG bailout than my local Ralphs supermarket cares about advancing kosher laws by selling products that are certified kosher," UCLA law professor Eugene Volokh, who expects the case to be thrown out, wrote in his Volokh Conspiracy blog.
Robert Tuttle, constitutional law professor at George Washington University, told Fox News that he doubts the case will go to trial: "The question is whether the government has funded religion, not whether the religion is good or bad that the government has funded. Then the next question is whether the government is responsible for what AIG has done. I can't imagine any court saying, under existing law, that the government will be responsible for what AIG does."
Anti-Islam conspiracy theorists will have a field day with this one, regardless of what happens to the lawsuit. But the case does raise some interesting questions about the application of Sharia law in western democracies and economies.
Are companies that pursue religious clients endorsing that religion? Can and should every faith group have its own financial products? Can democracy accommodate any aspect of Sharia? Could capitalism survive without interest?
For now, I'll go with On Faith panelist and Interfaith Alliance chief Welton Gaddy's bottom line on Sharia in the West: "If a conflict arises between American law and religious laws, the Constitution prevails."
at Monday, June 01, 2009 0 comments
Labels: AIG, AIG Insurance, Insurance
Car Tax Prices Online
Whitley Bay, Tyne and Wear, UK, ( Newdesignworld ) May 4, 2009 – The laws and rules pertaining to car taxes in the UK has changed dramatically which has caused quite a bit of confusion when it comes to knowing how much you will need to pay for your new car or even your older cars.
Car Tax Prices Online was created to help every consumer learn the new laws that are being implemented as well as provide them with all the information they need to understand the laws as well as utilize the tools on their website to calculate their (http://www.cartaxprices.co.uk) car tax.
On the Car Tax Prices Online website, you will find a wealth of information that will give you all the details concerning the new car taxes and how they are determined. Throughout the website, you will find such topics as Car Tax Prices, car tax bands. C02 emission rates, cheaper car insurance, electric cars, petrol costs, hydrogen cars, and more.
Informing consumers with all the tools, they need to find a cheaper car insurance, economical cheap electric cars, and economical cheap hydrogen cars. Discovering how CO2 emission rates effect the tax rate placed on cars in the UK is very important to every driver. As stated, on their website, “Up to now, C02 emissions did not seem a subject important enough, but now Chancellor Alistair Darling is now adamant to change the view. New car (http://www.cartaxprices.co.uk) tax rates UK, present an upward shift with the car gas emission statistics.”
For this reason alone, Car Tax Prices Online was created to provide car buyers the opportunity to learn all there is to know about the car taxes and how to calculate what the costs will be for every make and model of car. For those, looking to purchase a new car in the UK, the website offers all the information so consumers will know what the car tax prices will be for all cars to help them make an educated decision on the type of new car to purchase with less car tax to pay.
Going a bit farther than just car tax prices, the website offers help to find cheap car insurance as well as cheaper cars. With the aid of Car Tax Prices Online, UK residents will find the information they need to choose a cheap car, have cheaper car tax prices to pay, and save money.
at Monday, May 04, 2009 0 comments
Labels: auto, car insurance, Insurance
Ex-AIG CEO Hank Greenberg launches new insurer
Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, one-time CEO of American International Group and one of the insurer's largest shareholders, is reuniting with some of his former colleagues for a new insurance venture.
Greenberg's firm, C.V. Starr & Company, has launched Iron-Starr Agency Limited, a joint venture with Ironshore Inc. Iron-Starr Excess will act as a specialty lines insurance and reinsurance managing general agency, domiciled in Bermuda, according to an announcement from C.V. Starr.
Initially, Iron-Starr Excess will focus on the production of excess financial and commercial lines insurance and reinsurance products through U.S. insurers, Bermuda or other offshore carriers, including catastrophic excess casualty insurance for Fortune 2000 and other clients. It will issue policy limits up to $75 million.
"There are significant opportunities in this market, and C.V. Starr together with Ironshore has the team to get the job done," Greenberg said in a statement.
Kevin Kelley, Ironshore's CEO who used to work under Greenberg at AIG's Lexington Insurance subsidiary, said in a prepared statement that the partnership allows his company to enter the excess casualty market "with additional backing and support to offer larger limits, consistent with the needs of these clients."
"We look forward to developing a long-standing relationship with C. V. Starr and are excited about this new venture," he said. "This arrangement will assure customers that during these challenging times, they have a syndicated alternative that understands their needs and has the experience to be a long-term solution on Finance."
Ironshore also features six former AIG employees as its executives.
Greenberg has been a frequent critic of the $150 billion federal bailout of AIG, the company he left in 2005 amid money mismanagement claims by former New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer.
In November, Greenberg told IFAwebnews.com that while the impact of the relief funding will take years to realize, he believes AIG will be minimized to a worldwide property-casualty company with "some modest life remaining assets, but it is hard to tell."
Greenberg has also been skeptical of the government's 79.9% ownership role in the insurer, as it could hurt raising capital in the future.
C.V. Starr is an independently owned holding company with insurance agencies and a portfolio of global investments. Through its insurance operations, C.V. Starr writes specialty lines covering aviation, marine, energy, excess casualty and property, accident and health, including risks with international exposures.
at Wednesday, January 28, 2009 1 comments
Labels: AIG, car insurance, insurer, Ironshore Inc
Madoff torts likely to plump up some insurance prices
at Monday, January 26, 2009 0 comments
Labels: AIG, Insurance, Ironshore Inc
Cheap Car Insurance Policy Options in 42 States
at Saturday, January 24, 2009 2 comments
Labels: car insurance
Former AIG Execs Creates U.S. P/C Operation
at Thursday, January 22, 2009 0 comments
Labels: Insurance, Ironshore Inc
Siemens upbeat on bribery insurance payout -report
Ironshore Hires Another Top AIG Executive
Recession compounds woes as millions lose jobs, insurance
at Thursday, January 15, 2009 0 comments
Labels: car insurance, Health care, USA
Ironshore Inc - Madoff May Cost Insurers $1 Billion to Cover Funds
Bernard Madoff, president and founder of Bernard L. Mandoff Investment Securities LLC, right, walks out of Manhattan federal court in New York, Jan. 5, 2009. Photographer: Jin Lee/Bloomberg News
at Tuesday, January 13, 2009 0 comments
Labels: Insurance, Ironshore Inc
Health Insurance Reform
at Tuesday, January 13, 2009 0 comments
Labels: Health Insurance
Health Care for the Unemployed
Imholtz: "Once they see the price and the cost there is invariably sticker shock, it's a huge amount of money, so people are really scrambling."
SCHIPing away at the need for health insurance
'No Insurance' Towing Filling Dallas Impound Lots
at Sunday, January 11, 2009 0 comments
Labels: car insurance, Dallas
The largest federal health insurance program
How to get flood insurance
Insurance scams charged in New Jersey
at Thursday, January 08, 2009 0 comments
Labels: Insurance, New Jersey, Scam
10.9 million Americans Have Individual Health Insurance Policies
Blue Shield of California Reinstates Insurance for Patients it Dropped
Florida Task Force Set to Vote on Citizens Insurance Reforms Today
at Tuesday, January 06, 2009 0 comments
Labels: Florida, insurer, Property Insurance
AIG's Boren, O'Brien to Head New Ironshore Environmental Insurance Unit
FACTBOX-US healthcare spending hit $2.2 trillion in 2007
- Healthcare made up 16.2 percent of U.S. Gross Domestic Product in 2007.
- In 2007, 31 percent of healthcare dollars went to hospitals, 21 percent to physicians and clinics, 7 percent on administrative costs, 10 percent to drugs, 25 percent to "other" and 6 percent to nursing homes.
- Private insurance paid 35 percent of this; Medicare 19 percent; Medicaid and the State Children's Health Insurance Program 15 percent; 12 percent from other public funds; 7 percent from other private sources; and 12 percent was paid for out of pocket by patients.
- Hospital spending was $696.5 billion while doctor and clinical services spending was $478.8 billion.
- Medicare, the federal health insurance program for the elderly, spent $431.2 billion overall in 2007 while Medicaid, the state-federal health insurance plan for the poor and disabled, spent $329.4 billion.
- Private health insurance premiums were $775 billion while patients spent $268.6 billion out of their own pockets.
Obama's Health Care Resolutions Can't Be Kept
-- that if they like the health insurance they have today, nothing will change, and
-- that his health reform plan will save the typical American family $2,500 annually in health care costs.
Yet, if Obama sticks with the health proposals he has outlined so far, it is highly unlikely that either of these promises can be kept. And that’s putting it charitably.
The main problem is that Obama has proposed creating a new government-sponsored enterprise — a taxpayer-financed health plan, run by federal officials, that would “compete” directly with private health plans. Moreover, the “competition” would take place through a new “national health insurance exchange,” something the president-elect envisions as a kind of national shopping mall for coverage, managed by Washington.
Unfortunately, rigorous analysis indicates this approach would end up displacing much of today’s existing private health coverage. Millions of Americans, especially those now getting coverage provided by their employers, would lose the private insurance plans they have today.
A government-run health plan is, of course, not a new idea. A perennial favorite among “liberal” health policy wonks, the program’s most recent high-profile champions include Tom Daschle, Obama’s choice for secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and Senator Max Baucus, chairman of the powerful Senate Finance Committee.
In the Obama version, the new government health plan would be open to the uninsured and those ineligible for other government coverage, like Medicare and Medicaid. It would feature comprehensive benefits like those available in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), the program that covers members of Congress, federal workers and retirees.
It sounds reasonable, but there’s one little problem with using the FEHBP as a model: It offers no government health plan at all. The FEHBP promotes premium-saving competition among a wide variety of health plans, but they are all private plans, ranging from managed care plans to health savings accounts.
In the FEHBP system, all of the risks and liabilities are assumed by private-sector plans, not by the taxpayers. But under the proposed new government health plan, taxpayers would be saddled with all the risks, losses, and liabilities—just as with the recent series of big bailouts.
Worse, in the Obama version, government officials would not only participate in the national competition by entering their own plan, they would also set the rules for the competition itself. It would be like having an umpire who not only makes the calls, but also fields one of the teams on the field. Some “fair” competition.
But “fairness” is not the biggest issue. What really matters is how it would affect your health coverage.
When the Obama health plan was unveiled, the Lewin Group, a nationally respected and politically independent econometrics firm based in Virginia, put it under the microscope. Their October 2008 analysis estimated the plan would help 26.6 million Americans gain health insurance coverage. A good thing, to be sure.
But Lewin concluded that the proposal would produce some very unpleasant changes, as well. Many employers would stop offering private coverage, switching an estimated 18.6 million employees over to the new government plan. Overall, Lewin estimated, 21.6 million Americans would lose their existing private health coverage, while the ranks of those insured by government (i.e., taxpayers) — under Medicaid and SCHIP, as well as the new plan — would swell by an estimated 48.3 million. These are bad things.
More recently, in a special Capitol Hill briefing, the Lewin Group unveiled an updated analysis of the government plan, based on different design elements. They projected that the loss of private health insurance coverage could range from a low of 10.4 million to a high of 118.5 million, depending on such factors as the pool of eligible enrollees and the kind of payment rates adopted by the new government plan.
Employers make the key decision to keep or dump health insurance; employees have little or no say in that decision. That’s why no one can promise that “nothing will change” for individuals and families who like their existing coverage.
President-elect Obama promised many changes. But in health care, he promised that change would ensure patient choice of doctor and care, without government interference. He also promised that (1) those who want to keep their current coverage would have no problem doing so and (2) those without coverage would get the same kind of insurance available to members of Congress. These are wonderful promises. But they can’t be kept with the approach he has suggested taking.
4 indicted in $1 billion insurance fraud scam
Four men are facing federal charges in a $1 billion Miami life insurance fraud first exposed in 2004.
A 25-count grand jury indictment Monday charges the four played roles in a scam that affected more than 28,000 Mutual Benefits Corp. investors. The company sold investments based on life insurance policies for the elderly, AIDS patients and terminally ill people. The longer a person lives, the less valuable the investment becomes.
Prosecutors say MBC failed to disclose risks, falsified life expectancy figures and mismanaged premium funds.
Federal regulators closed MBC in 2004 and its former president was previously convicted of securities fraud. Those charged in the latest indictment include two former MBC executives and two attorneys.
at Monday, January 05, 2009 0 comments
Labels: Life Insurance, Miami
UK floods may spark car insurance increase
at Monday, January 05, 2009 0 comments
Labels: car, car insurance, UK